760.747.3200

Contact Us

White and Bright Articles

Recent Court Ruling on Judgment Creditors’ Rights to Obtain Production of Documents from Judgment Debtors Over Objection of Privacy Rights of Third Parties

February 9, 2016

By: Michael A. Friedrichs

When seeking to enforce a civil judgment in California, judgment creditors should be aware of the tools available to them to obtain information on the assets and finances of judgment debtors. Under the Enforcement of Judgments Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 680.010 and following), one of the miscellaneous creditors’ remedies is the judgment debtor’s examination (Code of Civil Procedure Section 708.110).  The debtor’s examination allows the creditor to obtain an order for the debtor to appear in court and, if the order is personally served on the debtor at least 10 days prior to the hearing, it allows the judgment creditor to examine the judgment debtor, under oath.  The scope of the examination generally includes the nature, extent and location of the judgment debtor’s assets and finances, including any real and personal property (both general and intangible).  Judgment creditors should also be aware of other miscellaneous creditors’ remedies, including the option to serve the debtor with written questions, also known as  interrogatories (Code of Civil Procedure Section 708.020) and the option to inspect and copy documents from the debtor (Code of Civil Procedure Section 708.103).

In a recent case, SCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Superior Court (Western Albuquerque Land Holdings, LLC) (2015) 243 Cal. App. 741, the court discussed the creditor’s right to inspect and copy documents in the debtor’s possession, even though the documents contained information about third parties.  The court in SCC Acquisitions, Inc. allowed the judgment creditor to obtain discovery regarding third parties from the judgment debtor over the objection of the judgment debtor that certain of the requests violate the privacy rights of third parties.  In one document request, the creditor asked for documents “sufficient to show the name and address of each business in which each of (the debtor’s) current or former officers, shareholders, and/or directors now has an interest and the nature of each such person’s interest in each such business.”  The Court of Appeal found that the trial court had authority to order the judgment debtor to produce documents, and held that the discovery requests did not violate the privacy rights of the third parties.  This ruling upholds the broad right of judgment creditors to demand that any judgment debtor produce and permit the creditor to inspect and copy a document that is in the possession, custody or control of the debtor, and that the demand may be enforced to the same extent practicable and in the same manner as inspection demands in a civil action.

Michael Friedrichs is a partner at White and Bright specializing in real estate and business litigation and creditors in debt collection matters.  For questions relating to this article or for assistance with debt collection issues, please contact Mr. Friedrichs at White and Bright (760-747-3200).



White and Bright, LLP
970 Canterbury Place
Escondido, CA 92025

Phone: 760-747-3200
Fax: 760-747-5574